How Object Relations Control Relating

What’s Happening?

It depends on what you look at obviously
But even more it depends on the way that you see
—-Bruce Cockburn, Child of the Wind

object relation illustratin

We have been using this to illustrate and support our discussion of object relations. But this, like most two-dimensional illustrations, does not accurately reflect the situation. So, let’s delve into this perspective from two different perspectives!

The Way that You See

If we adjust the alignment of the three components, we get a better understanding of what’s happening.

internal object relation

The “bigger” person in this image is actually the small one (child) in the horizontal representation of an object relation. The “small” one in this image is the big other, but it is perceived through the child’s mental perspective. In the child’s mind, the other is huge.

The double arrow is actually a looping dynamic in which what is perceived triggers a reaction, which in turn reinforces beliefs about the other and the relationship, perpetuating the reaction and so on and so on…

Imagine the figure above is a lens in a pair of glasses. The lens includes the sense of me, the sense of the other, and the constellation of affect and energy. We spend most of our lives wearing these lenses —not as glasses, not as the lens in our eye, but as a filter in the data stream of mental processing.

The Way We Relate

If we look at this from the perspective of any normal interaction in the world, we get something like this:

object relations relationships

All the arrows are looping dynamics. So, the normal state of affairs (relating) involves two people with “triggered” object relations relating to each other as figments of imagination – mental representations from the past.

The internal sense of the relationship, then, is like an ice cream cone.

triple scoop ice cream cone

The cone represents the container or footing involved (rejecting, frustrating, good), the scoops represent the psychic constellation (thoughts, beliefs, ideas, history…), and the flavor is the affective nuclei. All together, they give you a relationship in the present, the “full-bodied” experience of the past – the faces have changed, but it’s the same old story.

The Same Old Story

The story’s the same
     The story’s the same
          The heart ever hungers
               while mind hunts the game

A heart once young as grass in the spring
   dries with the lessons a harsh world can bring
Childhood’s innocence ran through the fields
   and suffered the trauma that judgment yields
As you grew up and followed directions
    spontaneity died from others’ inspections

The story’s the same
     The story’s the same
          The heart ever hungers
               while mind hunts the game

Now that you’re molded like a lump of old clay
   your insides turn brittle as you bake day by day
Your face is chiseled in a permanent frown
   once green pastures have faded to brown
The body’s a sieve full of old holes
   and life a collection of meaningless roles

The story’s the same
     The story’s the same
          The heart ever hungers
               while mind hunts the game

When life is a cup emptied by grief
   the heart is readied for famine relief
A single tear falls on parched desert ground
   prompted by childhood’s shocking rebound
Pain is a flood like rains in the spring
   swelling the heart as new life they bring

The story’s the same
     The story’s the same
          The heart never hungers
               while mining its claim          (JH)

The Fly in the Ointment

self fly in ointment

The irritant, the pest in all of this, is “the self,” that pesky sense of familiarity that keeps buzzing around in the room of experience—what is happening. Here’s a snapshot of a small segment from the timeline of life:

timeline self familiarity

The colors represent different stages in life or streams of experience, with specific object relations that block or distort particular essential qualities. They are the strings in your tangled ball of a psyche.

Each frame of experience contains that pesky sense of self, and because each frame contains the pest, we believe it is part of the picture, but the picture is created in the moment; it’s what is actually happening.

The fly is inserted so fast it seems like it’s part of what’s arising, but it’s not. What is part of what is arising is the a sense of the phenomenology of the body, the mental processes, the energies, and affects. The mental process connects all the historical flies; the memory of that fly in every frame is what creates a sense of self through time.

You see? It’s created. The mind is taking the sense of familiarity and connecting (comparing it) to the billion trillion frames in your story, adding it to the story of a self as an asserted actual entity.

Up Next

Object Relations: Trauma & Healing

John Harper is a Diamond Approach® teacher, Enneagram guide, and student of human development whose work bridges psychology, spirituality, and deep experiential inquiry. His newest book, Nurturing Essence: A Compass for Essential Parenting, invites parents to discover the role essence plays in child development. He is also the author of The Enneagram World of the Child: Nurturing Resilience and Self-Compassion in Early Life and Good Vibrations: Primordial Sounds of Existence, available on Amazon.

Support a Return to Connection — Share This with a Friend

Leave a Comment